Minutes
from the Annual General Meeting January 24,
2000
People who
signed in or were otherwise noted to be present:
John Andrews Lisa (aka Lacey) Axmaker Stuart
Axmaker John Bartley
Kristy Bates John C. Bunnell Debbie
Cross Randy Fischer
Page Fuller Megaera Jarvis Samuel
C. Justice Dean Koenig
Melvin Krehbiel Patrick S. Lasswell David Levine David Lohkamp
John Lorentz Michael C.
Monical Andrew
Nisbet Linda Pilcher
Lea Rush Ruth Sachter Scott
Sanford Melanie Schaber
David Schaber Debra Stansbury Fred
B. Torck Robert Verde
Marc Wells Patty Wells James
Wilsonsage Paul Wrigley
Joyce
Zimmerschied
Proxies from
(held by): Tracey Bailey (Robert Verde), Doug Bissell (Robert Verde), Kim
Bissell (Kristy Bates), Cecilia A. Eng (Andrew Nisbet), James Fiscus (Page
Fuller), Don Glover (Robert Verde), Vicki Harrison (Ruth Sachter), Ann &
Barbara Hoffert (Robert Verde), David O. E. Mohr (Melanie Schaber), Barbara
Oldham (Page Fuller), Anne Peck (Robert Verde), Jeff Peck (John Lorentz), Jim
Pilcher (Linda Pilcher), Mark Edward Reed (David Schaber), Kurt Roithinger
(John Bartley), Mary Rosenblum (Page Fuller), Sharon Sbarsky (Ruth Sachter),
Ariel Shattan (Debbie Cross), Sean Troupe (Linda Pilcher), Helen Umberger
(Kristy Bates), Tom Whitmore (Secretary–Ruth Sachter), Ben Yalow (Marc Wells),
Chris York (Ruth Sachter).
Barbara
Hoffert, Megaera Jarvis, Melvin Krehbiel, Mark Edward Reed, Kurt Roithinger,
Scott Sanford, and James & Pam Wilsonsage all accepted membership in the
corporation.
(Minutes
are sketchy–the room was too large for the tape recorder to catch most people’s
voices. Tape transcribed by John
Lorentz, including notes from Ruth Sachter.)
David
called the meeting to order by pointing out the four exits in the room. (In case of airsickness, you should
depart immediately.)
Minutes
from the previous annual meeting were accepted many to none. (Robert Verde did have a question–were the
unmarked budget numbers, included with the minutes, from Westercon? Yes.)
Treasurer's
Report (John Lorentz): (the yellow piece of paper) Robert Verde: The budgeted amount for the
storage fees was higher than actual?
John Lorentz: We'd budgeted for an increase in rental, and they thwarted
us by not raising the rent. The report
was accepted.
Election
of Directors: David Levine: The ten directors are elected
to alternating two-year terms, with five being elected each year. So we have five terms expiring this year. Additionally, this year, one of the
continuing directors is resigning as of the end of this meeting. In the past when this has happened, the
members have elected five Directors (the five with the highest vote total) to
two-year terms and direct the Board to appoint the next highest vote-getter to
the vacant spot. (Board appointments
are for one year.) The five continuing
members are: Kristy Bates, John Lorentz, Ruth Sachter, Robert Verde, and Patty
Wells, (with Robert Verde resigning after the Board meeting following this
meeting tonight). Members whose terms
were expiring were Page Fuller, Dean Koenig, Andy Nisbet, Linda Pilcher &
Marc Wells–Page is not running for reelection to the Board. All nominees have to be members of the
corporation.
Nominations
were opened: Dean Koenig, Andy Nisbet, Melanie Schaber, Linda Pilcher, Helen
Umberger, Fred Torck, Marc Wells, Randy Fischer, John Bunnell, David Levine,
John Andrews, David Schaber, David Lohkamp.
Debbie
Cross reminded people to put last names on the ballot–last year, a few votes
had to be discarded because people just wrote "David" when multiple
'Davids' had been nominated. People
need to received a majority vote by the meeting to be elected to the Board.
So far, we
have 72 members, and 52 here, or by proxy.
It takes 37 to change a bylaw and 27 for any other action (including
electing people to the Board). (This
changed to 28 when three more people arrived after the Board of Directors
election.)
[Long
gap while votes were counted—people milled around, talking about important
things. Then the vote count was done,
and we all went back to silly OSFCI matters.]
Paul
Wrigley: The annual general meeting has elected four people to the Board of
Directors: Dean Koenig, Linda Pilcher, David Levine, Melanie Schaber. (These were the only four who received more
than half the vote.) The next two were
Marc Wells & Randy Fischer.
Continuing
Business: None.
New
Business:
Bylaws
changes: Four possible changes were emailed
out in advance of the meeting (but unfortunately to only a small group of
people):
Board of
Director Meeting Dates (John Lorentz): Some of the meetings recently have
gone very long, and we've had a hard time scheduling special meeting
dates. So John’s feeling was that it's
time to expand from a quarterly schedule to a bimonthly schedule (six meetings
a year instead of four), with the hope that the meetings will run shorter and
more efficiently, and they wouldn't be such a draining experience for everyone
involved.
John
Lorentz’s proposal was that we change Section VIII (Board Meetings) of the
Bylaws to read:
The annual meeting of OSFCI shall be on the fourth Monday of
each January. Regular meetings of the
OSFCI Board of Directors shall be on the fourth Monday of January (following
the general meeting), March, May (or on the third Monday if Memorial is the
fourth Monday), July and September, and the first Monday in December. The date of any of these meetings may be
changed to the third or fifth Monday of the respective Month (or the second
Monday in December) by an absolute majority of the Board of Directors at the
pervious regularly-scheduled meeting.
Additionally, the date of a regularly-scheduled meeting may be changed
by the OSFCI President on an emergency basis, upon consultation with the rest
of the Board, in case of weather emergency, civil disturbance or other “act of
God”. This will not affect the
scheduled meeting date of any following meeting.
Directors must be informed of the time and place at least
seven (7) days before each meeting.
Special meetings of the Board of Directors may be called by a majority
of the Officers or written request of four (4) of the Directors. Except in the case of emergency (as
described above), no regularly-scheduled OSFCI meeting shall start before
7:30PM.
Question:
Why specify the dates in the Bylaws?
John Lorentz: That's so people can plan ahead for these dates and we
aren’t scrambling at the last minute to find a date that works for everyone. Ruth Sachter: And this way the dates can
also be listed on the web page.
What is the
largest cons these dates conflict with?
V-Con in May? (The switch away
from Memorial weekend would avoid BayCon.)
Ruth: There's also always the possibility that the date in September can
conflict with the Jewish Holidays. (The
existing bylaw allows the Board to switch meeting dates to the previous or
following in the same month.)
The
question was called–the motion passed.
Free and
Open Access to Information (John Bartley): Currently section 11, Paragraph B of the 1987 Bylaws
says "All powers assigned to the officers or the Board of Directors are
retained by the membership." I
wish to add text to that: "Members shall always have free and open access
to all programming, records and documentation of the corporation upon written
or e-mailed request; excepting: (a) privacy requirements of federal, state and
local law; (b) protections determined by the Board to guard the privacy of the
convention attendees; (c) bank and charge card and other account numbers of
members; (d) copyrights of publishers, performers, artists and
authors." Question: What is meant by "members"? John Bartley: Convention and corporation
members. Question: <mumble> Left
Coast Crime <mumble>? John: We
can incorporate that proviso in Appendix B of the OSFCI (Sponsorship)
Guidelines as well as future contracts.
John
Bunnell: Point of order–I do not believe we have a motion on the floor yet for
this Bylaw change. John Bartley: I so
move. Second? Melanie Schaber, for purposes of discussion. There were questions about the effect of the
bylaw change, as many people hadn't received the e-mailed explanation sent over
the week. John Bunnell: I move that the
this be referred to a bylaw committee to examine it and report back with
suitable language at the next annual meeting of the corporation. (Second by David Schaber.) There was some discussion on whether this
was a new motion, such that John Bartley's motion be considered
first. It was ruled that John Bunnell's
motion is a proposed amendment to John Bartley's motion, and should be
considered now. (This discussion also
lead to a consideration of using Robert's Rules of Order as our parliamentary
guide, as we don't have a specified guide now.
Andrew Nisbet said he'd probably make a motion later that we adopt
Robert's.)
Robert
Verde: I would further amend John's (Bunnell) motion to include preparation of
an explanatory statement for the members of OSFCI to be included with the
report to the Board. John Bunnell
accepted that modification to his proposed amendment. Someone made a motion to amend John Bunnell's motion to
explicitly include John Bartley in this proposed subcommittee. John Bunnell did not want to include that
change in his motion. He said he had no
objection to having John Bartley on the committee–his objection was
procedural. (He just didn't want to tie
any particular person to the committee in his motion.) The amendment motion carried many to
four. So John Bunnell's amendment now
is to refer John Bartley’s proposed bylaw change to a committee, which will
include John Bartley, to review the Bylaws and report back any proposed changes
to the next annual meeting.
Robert
called the question on John Bunnell's amendment. It was decided to allow Andy and John Bunnell to speak first.
Andrew: It
seems like setting up a committee to discuss a single bylaw change is
excessive. To the extent that the
Bylaws have any problems with them, it would seem appropriate for the members
suggest to the Board that a bylaw committee be set up to actually submit a
rework of the Bylaws at the next meeting.
But to delay the whole process for a full year just to have the
committee report on a single change serves no useful purpose.
John
Bunnell: There were two reasons I made the motion (to refer the bylaw change to
committee). The first reason that I
made the motion is that I think it is unwise for us as an organization to vote
on any Bylaws amendment that we have not had a chance to read and review for
the meeting. Secondly, I’m making this
motion because it is my belief that this bylaw change could have potentially
significant effects on OSFCI’s legal obligations and liabilities with respect
to state laws on non-profit corporations.
It would behoove us to examine any change with that potential effect
carefully and with perhaps the advice of a lawyer. I had planned to make similar motions with respect to Mr.
Bartley’s other amendments–these could be assigned to the same committee as
this one.
Lacey
Axmaker: First of all, I support Andrew’s idea of having a committee go through
the entire Bylaws for review. Secondly,
I want repercussions of the amendment to be thoroughly explored–not just one
the statutes, but also with respect to the reactions of the convention
attendees–and there will be reactions.
Just running Art Show, I’ve seem extreme reactions to requests of
information from them. John Bartley:
This amendments allows the Board to set rules.
Right now, there are no rules and I want to specifically delegate this
to the Board. Debra: I think we should
send the entire Bylaws to the committee for review. I’m a little concerned about releasing membership information to
the public. And a lot of us haven’t had
a chance to look these proposals over and would be uncomfortable voting on these
items without having that chance.
John
Bunnell: If we pass this motion to table the proposed bylaw change, could we–by
reference–also include the other bylaw proposals and send all four to
committee? David levine: In my opinion,
yes. John Bunnell: Then I would restate
my motion that a committee be formed, including Mr. Bartley, to study the
Bylaws and these three proposed (bylaw) amendments and report back to the
membership next year. Someone: Does
this include the meeting date change?
John Bartley: I would think that John Lorentz’s motion, since the
membership did approve it, stands.
David: Yes it’s already been incorporated into the Bylaws.
After some
off-topic discussion, Robert called the question. This motion passed. The
vote was taken on John Bunnell’s motion to refer John Bartley’s motions
(including his “Electronic Notice Equivalent to Mailed Notice” and “Electronic
Access to OSFCI Records” motion) to committee.
The motion passed, with 44 in favor of referring them to committee, to
be comprised of a group not limited to BOD members.
Adopting
Robert’s Rules of Order (Andrew Nisbet): After some
confusion whether consider a motion to adjourn before Andrew’s motion, Andrew
moved that we create (bylaw) section
#13, that will state:
In meetings of OSFCI, both general meetings of OSFCI and
Board meetings of OSFCI, will be governed by Robert’s Rules of Order (Newly
Revised).
The motion
was seconded. There ensued
discussion. (Robert: It seems kind
of sneaky to slide this in without Kevin Standlee being here.) Some people against the motion felt that
it tied the hands of the committee already set up to reword the Bylaws. Others thought that this meeting showed a
need for a standard parliamentary authority so that everyone would be operating
under the same parameters. John Bartley
pointed out that the Bylaws do not require that they be amended only at the
Annual Meeting. Oregon Statutes permit
voting by mail. Therefore, this can be
proposed to the membership on paper or electronically, as can any other future
bylaw or motion. The members can vote
on it by mail or electronically, and they can discuss it by mail or
electronically. The motion passed, with
more than 41 in favor.
Ruth
apologized for the shortcomings of the past year’s Secretarial Office, and the
meeting was adjourned at 9PM.
NOTE:
Although they were not formally presented at the meeting, here is the text, as
received by e-mail, of John Bartley’s other two proposed motions, since they
will be considered by the committee set up at this meeting:
Bartley's
Proposed By-Law Addition Two: Titled ELECTRONIC NOTICE EQUIVALENT TO MAILED
NOTICE
Suggested
to add a new Section 13 (as per the 1987-01-26 By-Laws edition) or equivalent
designation:
13. Notice of meeting and communications from OSFCI and
affiliated cons shall allow the use of return-receipted electronic mail
transmission to current members, and posting on Internet web sites for future
members, in a format natively understandable to common text and speech only WWW
browsers on multiple computing and
operating systems, of information instead of US Mail on an opt-in basis,
whereby the member must specifically request they receive notices and
information by electronic mail rather than by US Mail. This shall not prevent a member from
receiving all information by US Mail if they so prefer.
Bartley's
Proposed By-Law Addition Three: Titled ELECTRONIC ACCESS TO OSFCI RECORDS
Suggested
to add a new item (4), Paragraph B, Section 5 (as per the 1987-01-26 By-Laws
edition) or equivalent designation:
5. B. (4) The Secretary shall post all records of the
Corporation and financial records provided by conventions to OSFCI (excluding
data protected by privacy or other statute) to a web site accessible to the
Members . The act of posting and
maintaining the website may be delegated or assigned, but the Secretary shall
retain oversight in the operation of that website. It must be natively understandable to common text and speech only
WWW browsers on multiple computing and operating systems.
and a new
item (4), Paragraph C, Section 5 (as per the 1987-01-26 By-Laws edition) or
equivalent
designation:
5. C. (4) The Treasurer shall provide financial statements
to the Secretary, in an electronic format as requested by the Secretary, so
statement may be posted on the website.